if you took all the fishes and shit out of the ocean all the displaced water would expose (i'd guess) a shit-ton more coastline.

Made popular on: 
Sat, 11/28/2009 - 4:40pm


Comments

 
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 9:24pm
kcmo.420 Says:

Actually, the surface of the earth is rock solid. There is water on 70% of the earth's surface - but the surface is not water itself. Ponder that after a few bong hits.

 
 
Sat, 11/28/2009 - 4:30pm

your talking about volume now..they mean just the surface of the earth is 70% water.

this has already been a highdea twice now or something

 
 
Sat, 11/28/2009 - 11:45pm
lukeG Says:
 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 1:36am
xhighguyx Says:
 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 1:55am

How much bigger would the ocean be if sponges didn't live in it?

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 1:56am

no fucking way... you're such a dumbass.. there are so many thousands of miles of unihabited water.. it would not go down that much

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 3:51pm
 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 2:48am
mat Says:

yea but ur not thinkin about the fishies..... Nd besides i think that the scientists arent stupid and thought about the fish.

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 2:35pm
Dox Says:

Naw dude, the oceans are just mind bogglingly large.

If you took out every fish, mammal, crustacean, and human debris, you'd probably lower the ocean levels by a half an inch or so. And that's being generous.

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 3:16pm
TJHenri Says:

Fun to think about but most living things that on this planet are more liquid than solid. The animals walking on dry land are just solid bags of liquid.

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 4:38pm
buddha Says:

Further more, do you think that overpopulation on our planet could affect the ecosystem by displacing the air and pushing the ozone further away? Think about it

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 6:08pm
johnloper Says:

No matter how many people there are we will have the same mass on this planet. More people less food, less people more food. always a constant mass

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 6:33pm
Dox Says:

This absolute bastardization of the concept of conservation of mass/energy has been brought to you by: Weed!

 
 
Sun, 11/29/2009 - 9:54pm
MikeLane Says:

Guys this shit was like six weeks old, hahaha.

 
 
Sun, 12/06/2009 - 4:53pm
Crogboi Says:

nah man you got it wrong, it all depends how deep you define "surface". It would have to be like anywhere wherewater is ontop of land in air, like puddles and shit aswell...