35

the earth's surface really isn't 70% water

if you took all the fishes and shit out of the ocean all the displaced water would expose (i'd guess) a shit-ton more coastline.

Submitted by: MikeLane 20 weeks 5 days ago – Made popular 14 weeks 3 days ago
Category: science   Tags:

Actually, the surface of the earth is rock solid. There is water on 70% of the earth's surface - but the surface is not water itself. Ponder that after a few bong hits.

your talking about volume now..they mean just the surface of the earth is 70% water.

this has already been a highdea twice now or something

OH SHIT

My mind has been blown.

How much bigger would the ocean be if sponges didn't live in it?

no fucking way... you're such a dumbass.. there are so many thousands of miles of unihabited water.. it would not go down that much

I am dumb. Nothing to see here.

yea but ur not thinkin about the fishies..... Nd besides i think that the scientists arent stupid and thought about the fish.

Naw dude, the oceans are just mind bogglingly large.

If you took out every fish, mammal, crustacean, and human debris, you'd probably lower the ocean levels by a half an inch or so. And that's being generous.

Fun to think about but most living things that on this planet are more liquid than solid. The animals walking on dry land are just solid bags of liquid.

Further more, do you think that overpopulation on our planet could affect the ecosystem by displacing the air and pushing the ozone further away? Think about it

No matter how many people there are we will have the same mass on this planet. More people less food, less people more food. always a constant mass

This absolute bastardization of the concept of conservation of mass/energy has been brought to you by: Weed!

Guys this shit was like six weeks old, hahaha.

nah man you got it wrong, it all depends how deep you define "surface". It would have to be like anywhere wherewater is ontop of land in air, like puddles and shit aswell...