21

Proof of The Upper Limit of Speed dependant on light

If distance equals rate times time (d=rt), then d/t=r. If the smallest interval of length is the Planck length (lp) and the shortest interval of time is the Planck second (tp); then the fastest possible speed is calculated to be lp/tp=c, or the speed of light.

I suppose this makes sense because even if the values for the Planck scale are wrong or there is no inherent Planck length & time in the universe, we are bound to certain limits. After all, any information must travel at the speed of light because any tool we use will transmit data at 'c'. Furthermore, because of this fact, a Planck mass must exist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_scale

Submitted by: Ganymede 34 weeks 4 days ago – Made popular 17 weeks 1 day ago
Category: science   Tags:

Any system based on universal constants is flawed. Because we cannot measure 'prove' something does not mean it does not exist, plank scale is base on what we can prove. The act of measuring itself skews the equation. Time is defined to be what our clocks measure. There is no 'time', it is the decaying and reforming of anti-matter that we should better 'measure'. Perception is faster then 'time'. I can write this x= 7*24^69 meters per second, but it cannot be done; can it or did it not just happen.

not to mention, you can move faster than the speed of light relative to certain things, ie. your surroundings

Normally, I would have read that once, and, not understanding, given up... but, since im ripped, i kept readin till i fully understood and WOW!!

relativity, if i'm going 3/4 of the speed of light, and someone else is going 3/4 of the speed of light, then relative to that person (or planet, or whatever it may be) i'm going 1.5 times the speed of light.

someone needs to review their basic physics :/. everything is relative to their geodesic in SPACETIME, not SPACE. So i don't feel like doing the lorentz contraction here. but if both of you were traveling that fast you would move 75% slower through time thus neither would appear to the other as moving faster than the speed of light. plus direction matters in vectors...are they moving towards or away from eachother...

the only way to travel faster then light is by increasing the maximum speed of light relative to spacetime. this can only be achieved through extreme geodesic warping or hyperdimensional phase shifts as far as i know.

dont make me bust out my orson scott card SF. too late. Ansibles are faster than light. what now bisnatches?

but...physics is comprised of theories and ideas...think about it. all the stuff is made up by us and we made it so everything explains something else...but what if that something else wasn't really true in the first place? it's baffling

are you all MIT students? lol

Cal Poly SLO grad, close enough!

dnt get me wrong this is brilliant and i couldnt hold a candle to it but electrons have to move faster than the speed of light. u see like a thousand of them that looks like a cloud through electron microscopes and theres only one flyin around

not exactly, they are actually in multiple places at once when those clouds appear. quantum decoherance, tunneling, and entanglement. these properties are forced by the uncertainty principle. which is caused by reimann spheres projected onto tightly wound hyperdimensions called superstrings (at least according to the superstring theorists, but its the best answer we'll ever come up with).

haha i don't even start college till next year...fuck high school

forreal dude. haha

I believe they have discovered some sort of new atom that can theoretically travel faster than the speed of light. All this theoretical shit makes me angry though lol. But what has been proven is that some galaxies are accelerating away from each other faster than the speed of light. I am convinced that this is just another hurdle mankind needs to climb. I believe one day, if we are around long enough, we will break that barrier. Or, perhaps, find a way around it.

boobs

someday the aliens will contact us and enlighten us on the real physics of the universe. i only understood part of this shit but i know that what we don't know far exceeds what we do know.

I feel like a retard fuck you trying to confuse us and shit.

im i the only one who has no fucking clue what hes saying holy shit man u just blew my mind

This equation assumes the fastest thing in the universe is light,

which may be true.

But just in case we can simply assume that "c" stands for whatever the fastest thing in the universe is.

Well, if we're going based on physics, of course you're correct, but the world is only what we perceive. Perceptions differ from one person to the next, one organism to the next.

Because speed is based on time, which is only a variable because time is fluid and though we are only moving through it at the rate we are it may be possible to increase or decrease it's rate, then d=r(t) is also variable. We're only human, we'll never get a handle on the world, or at least what we think it is.

The existance of things like FTL-particles is just baffling, like the tachyon.
With the tachyon being able to travel faster than light, if you sent that tachyon out to a spaceship that was flying away, at a certain speed for the ship, you would actually receive your tachyon before you sent it.

So if you think about it, if you received your tachyon back, it would HAVE to be sent to that spaceship sometime in the future. It would absolutely have to happen, no matter what (it always will) because it would break causality.

Me and my friends would talk about this stoned and then it got to the point where one of us would say something random, as if it were the answer to a something, and then the other person would have to come up with a question for it.
"Yeah, dude, your poodle is in the freezer, I totally didn't have sex with it or anything"
"What the fuck dude, what happened to my poodle???"

Fuck I'm stoned.
And fuck do I love physics.

When did stoners get so smart?
fuck. Where was I when this happened?

This... Is like a fuckin mind grenade, yet it's completely logical.

how the hell could you down vote this? This is brilliant! And string theory is a beautiful thing, but it cant be tested. E=MC^2 or does it???