Underwear with pockets so you can keep things on your person without having to go through the hassle or uncomfortability of pants

Made popular on: 
Sun, 07/26/2009 - 1:03am


Comments

 
Sat, 07/25/2009 - 2:17pm

awesome.

---------------------------------
you'd better notice this degroot.

 
 
Sun, 07/26/2009 - 2:22am
whynot Says:
 
 
Sun, 07/26/2009 - 9:22pm
Itsasix Says:

You could hide your weed in the pockets!!!!

 
 
Mon, 07/27/2009 - 3:04am
Human Says:

great adaptation i hadn't even thought of that

 
 
Sun, 07/26/2009 - 9:36pm

whynot,
are you talking to me or human?

---------------------------------
you'd better notice this degroot.

 
 
Tue, 07/28/2009 - 9:17pm
 
 
Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:27pm
g00sebump Says:

Unfortunately, I run the risk of sinking this beloved ship we've all joined on.

I think the reason pockets aren't on boxers normally is because pockets actually, being thicker, are more prone to being effective insulation. We'd all have nasty, sweaty legs if we wore these.

Besides, they exist. "Boxer shorts" are what they are called, and I wore them Freshman year in college...everyone thought I just had my boxers on all the time, it was great.

 
 
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 1:25am

this already exists, I bought a pair of rocawear boxers in the boogie down this winter which just so happened to have a barley noticeable little pocket sewed to the elastic band on the inside. it can fit about three lighters, a couple plastic baggies and a crack pipe on top so it's perfect for the average joe with a crack habit and a picky taste in lighters who hates wearing pants but hates not having pockets even more.